More agile than some might think, the best modern encryption solutions are not only suitable for networks of all shapes and sizes, from modest 10Mbps to ultra-fast 100Gbps speeds, they occupy a barely perceptible presence on the network, are transparent to all other devices and result in minimal latency (frequently less than 4µs at higher speeds).

Bringing Agility to Cryptography

Crypto-agility, however, is much more than simple performance statistics. It comes from compatibility and interoperability, from FPGA-based flexibility and from the ability to support custom cryptographic elements. It even enables a choice of encryption algorithms and standards.

Truly high-assurance encryption solutions are based on standards-based algorithms, typically AES 128 or 256bit. However, If you are able to provide your own, you may prefer to use those; there’s nothing that says you must use the manufacturer’s standard algorithm.

An encryption platform should offer support for as many of these algorithms as possible. For example, CFB (Cipher Feedback) mode, CTR (Counter) mode and GCM – an authenticated encryption mode.

That’s true agility.

Beyond encryption modes, agility should extend to support for other custom components, such as user-defined curves, external certificate authorities and sources of randomness.

Flexible FPGA Architecture

Senetas CN Series hardware encryptors feature advanced FPGA architecture, which enables in-field upgrades (something not possible with hybrid encryptors, or lower assurance security devices).

This is a key point of differentiation for Senetas customers, as it effectively future-proofs the technology. If, for example, NIST introduces a new quantum-resistant algorithm in the future; Senetas customers simply load the new algorithm to the system without interruption. This helps to maintain a long-term return on investment and drives down the total cost of owning (TCO) Senetas hardware.

Post-Quantum Cryptography

Since the beginning of the 21st century, technology companies have been investing billions of dollars in the race to develop the first commercially viable quantum computer.

The dawn of the “quantum era” will soon be upon us and promises exponential growth in computing power; leading to significant advancements in the research and development of communications, pharmaceuticals, artificial intelligence and more. However, the quantum computer also poses an existential threat to encryption security as we know it today. It threatens the public key encryption infrastructure that underpins our global digital economy.

Quantum Resistant Algorithms

To mitigate this risk, NIST is working on a program to standardise the next generation of “quantum-resistant” encryption algorithms; designed to remain secure in a post-quantum computing world. The project is already underway, with the first draft standards due for publication as soon as 2022.

Once standardised the current generation of encryption algorithms will need to be replaced with these new quantum-resistant algorithms. This will ultimately require an update to all software and hardware devices that use Public Key encryption globally.

With this in mind, Senetas has adopted a strategy to help customers with the transition to post-quantum cryptography. NIST guidelines recommend adopting a hybrid classic/quantum state in anticipation of the new standards. Senetas hardware encryptors will support this hybrid approach in a free firmware upgrade, likely to be available by the end of 2020.

Quantum Key Distribution

Senetas’ end-to-end encryption solutions already feature integrated support for external quantum key generation (QKD), thanks to its long-standing relationship with Swiss Quantum specialists ID Quantique.

The CN Series of hardware encryptors can connect to a QKD appliance via a secure local connection. The QKD appliance connects over a separate fibre optic cable or wavelength to a peer device across the network and exchanges keys using QKD protocols.

Senetas encryptors can then use the QKD keys together with their own keys that are securely distributed across the network using conventional public key techniques. This approach combines the best of classical and quantum key distribution and ensures that, should either approach fail or generate weak keys, there is an additional layer of defence for the customer.

The dawn of the “quantum era” will soon be upon us and promises exponential growth in computing power. However, the quantum computer also poses an existential threat to encryption security as we know it today.